Recent

Nile| Tedros: Ethiopia won’t halt or downsize Renaissance dam

Highlights:
* Ethiopia would not accept any one-sided arrangements in the utilization of the Nile waters

* Ethiopia would neither accept any proposal that suggested halting the construction of the Dam nor to reduce the Dam’s size

* Using the issue of GERD for mater to domestic political ends is a dangerous game

Foreign Minister Dr. Tedros Adhanom met Mr. Jean Asselborn, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Luxembourg, with discussions covering Somalia, South Sudan and Sudan and International Criminal Court’s indictment of Kenyan political leaders as well as the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD).

The Luxembourg Deputy Premier briefed Dr. Tedros on his recent meeting with Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohammed Amr in Cairo. He said Egypt’s Foreign Minister had assured him that he rejected any aggressive postures. The tone of their discussion had been the need for normalcy and to de-escalate any rhetoric and noise.

Dr. Tedros for his part reiterated that Ethiopia’s position regarding GERD and the utilization of the Nile waters is a win-win approach. He said that Ethiopia would continue to use the Nile waters as long as this doesn’t pose significant harm on any other riparian states “in accordance with the principles of equitable and reasonable utilization.”

Dr. Tedros noted that Ethiopia’s energy demand was doubling every three years and the construction of GERD was part of the way of addressing those growing demands without which the country cannot realize its development potential and efforts.

He noted that Ethiopia would not accept any one-sided arrangements in the utilization of the Nile waters which left Ethiopia as no more than a bystander when it actually contributed 87% of the water. He said “Ethiopia cannot remain poor; it must utilize its resources to lift its people out of poverty.”

Dr. Tedros stated firmly that Ethiopia would neither accept any proposal that suggested halting the construction of the Dam nor to reduce the Dam’s size.

He pointed out that the International Panel of Experts report had confirmed that the construction of the Dam posed no appreciable harm on Sudan and Egypt. He explained that the frenzy over the ‘diversion’ of the river was misplaced.

He said what actually took place on the 28th of May was re-routing of the river, which did not affect the volume or flow of the water, was hardly something new. It is a well established fact which the Egyptians have also been aware of that a re-routing of the river is a must in the construction process of any dam. Dr. Tedros said panic about it came from misrepresentation.

Egypt, he pointed out, can only benefit from genuine partnership and he pointed out that Ethiopia accorded more weight to transparency over the issue than anything else. This was evident from its original initiative in establishing to establish the committee of experts that just finished its work.

He said using the issue of GERD for mater to domestic political ends was a dangerous game, and he repeated that the two countries, which he said were brought together by nature, could only benefit from cooperation. Dr. Tedros emphasized Ethiopia’s firm belief in dialogue.

**********

Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ethiopia

Source: HornAffairs.com

You are free to re-publish - just give credit to the author and to HornAffairs with a link.

Daniel Berhane
About Daniel Berhane (843 Articles)
Daniel Berhane

Comments

  1. Tourist Dilla says:

    As an Ethiopian am soo much disappointed With Mursi’s trial to determine the use of Ethiopian resources as his colonized fathers.
    We r 21C’s generations!I advise you to suicide yourself before leading today’s generation to war based on the routine and bankruptcy colonial agreements.
    We Ethiopian have a msg that Mursi and his blinded followers had to be born n finished their life time during colonial era.
    Now your words will force us to increase Ethiopian participations!

  2. kassahun says:

    How do the Egyptians understand diplomacy and a commitment for peace?, Do they think that being patient and committed for peace mean being coward? Do they think making a war rhetoric ‘psychological war’ makes Ethiopia to reconsider the construction of the dam? Do they know who Ethiopians are? Let alone having comparable military technology today, we fought an proportional war with Europeans only having the courage and love for our country while the other side had the latest military technology at the time. Let me tell our Egyptians friends to cool down and be rational…..being patient and giving way to diplomacy and dialogue does’t mean that Ethiopian’s get scared. It is rather a sign of maturity and living up to the expectation of the time. A problem of 21 century could only be solved with a level of thinking of the time. Otherwise we will teach you what war means! Learn from history that let alone fighting a country that could not resist a six days war (allying with other countries, against with a single country), Ethiopians have proved their strength and solidarity by cheesing out the Fascist aggressor! Finally, I’d like to remind Egyptians politicians what they are uttering has a serious ramifications to their own people. I say again, don’t try what you are saying, if not I assure you that “no one who has tried that has lived to tell the story”!